After the National Institute for Standards and Technology (NIST) identified upcoming challenges in the U.S. biopharmaceutical
manufacturing landscape (see document here), the National Institute for Innovation in Manufacturing Biopharmaceuticals (NIIMBL) was formed to help solve these challenges through the formation of a public-private partnership between industry, government, academia, and non-profits. The goal of
NIIMBL is to accelerate Biopharmaceutical manufacturing innovation, support the
development of standards that enable more efficient and rapid manufacturing
capabilities, and educate and train a world-leading Biopharmaceutical manufacturing
workforce to maintain the United States’ global lead and competitiveness in
this industry. NIIMBL will be leveraging a $70 million
investment from NIST, with
at least $129 million more in funds from private partners. One of the great
aspects of this institute is that they are encouraging partnership between
large companies and smaller or medium size companies (called Small to Medium
Enterprises “SME”), which will be sure to bolster innovation and streamline
commercialization and implementation of new technologies. Kelvin Lee, the
NIIMBL Institute Director, did a fabulous job taking the lead on organizing the Consortium's first National Meeting, where members from the United States Congress, Directors
from the Food and Drug Administration, and many executive level industry
representatives were invited to speak about the importance of manufacturing
sciences and the current challenges we are facing as an industry. I had the
opportunity to represent RoosterBio as an SME at this inaugural NIIMBL National
Meeting, and I gave a talk in the “Rapid Fire” SME Innovation Showcase, as well
as presented some of our work on how we are radically shortening the
development timelines of Biopharmaceuticals that include a stem cell-derived
component.
Confluent hMSCs on Solohill microcarriers. Image from RoosterBio Inc |
The technology gaps that he specifically
mentioned for upscaled hMSC manufacturing were downstream processing technologies, specifically the unit operations related to:
a. detaching
(or harvesting) the cells from microcarriers without damaging or changing the
cells in any way,
b. separating the detached cells from microcarriers
in suspension using an efficient, automated methodology, and
c.
concentrating large volumes of bulk cell
solution in a timely manner (<5 hours) to maintain cell viability and functionality.
I would like to
specifically address a couple of these challenges below:
The
harvest unit operation challenge mentioned above is due to the use of proteolytic
enzymes (i.e. trypsin) and agitation (i.e. shear forces) during cell dissociation, to dislodge cells from microcarriers, and is currently the industry standard. This unit operation must be done quickly and efficiently,
as over-trypsinization and long term exposure to high shear forces can be harmful
to the cells. To address some of limitations of conventional harvest enzymes, dissociation
reagents like TrypLE Select (Gibco-ThermoFisher), have been developed with
animal component-free materials, at cGMP grade and in a ready-to-use solution,
which will help to ease future regulatory burden. After the dissociation
enzymes have performed their function of detaching the cells from microcarriers, quenching the activity of the enzymes is critical for maintaining
viability of the bulk cell solution for further downstream processing. The
industry standard has been to use a solution of 2% fetal bovine serum in
phosphate buffered saline, but the presence of animal-derived components and variation
in efficacy of this quench solution pose challenges to its use in robust,
reproducible, cGMP-aligned manufacturing processes.. Thus, there is a
definitive need to develop a xeno-free alternative with validated inactivation of dissociation enzymes
to ensure optimal bioprocessing conditions.
Harvesting
of cells from microcarriers is then immediately followed by filtration of the
cell/microcarrier slurry through a porous mesh that traps the microcarriers,
while letting cells pass through. Dr. Russotti stressed that confirming
complete removal of the microcarriers from the cell therapy product is absolutely critical to ensuring
safety for the patient. At the small (0.1L to 5L) to medium (5L to 200L) scale bioreactor
size, conventional flow filtration technology has worked, but when the scale
increases to 200L and more, the volume of product to process can overwhelm most
systems. Upscaled technologies, like continuous flow centrifugation (kSep),
have been tested for cell suspensions but will require development and
validation for use with cell/microcarrier suspensions. A new and promising
technology innovation is the development
of completely dissolvable microcarriers,
which has the potential to obviate the cell/microcarrier separation unit
operation in the future, markedly streamlining and simplifying the downstream
processing of hMSCs expanded in microcarrier-based bioreactor systems.
While
there are several additional manufacturing challenges that will need to be
addressed prior to widespread commercial adoption of hMSC therapies, each of these
challenges creates opportunities to develop incrementally and radically innovative
products and processes as solutions. NIIMBL represents the perfect platform to
approach the challenges in upscaled cell therapy manufacturing through the
funding and support of proposals aimed at addressing these industry needs. Currently,
there are over 700 clinical trials (clinicaltrials.gov) using hMSCs, a number
which has more than doubled since 2014, and hMSCs are poised to be the transistor and
microchip equivalent of tomorrow’s Regenerative Medicine technology products.
These therapeutic cells are critical to many Regenerative Medicine applications, including cell and gene therapy, bioprinting, and tissue regeneration. The
many manufacturing science challenges like those outlined above create the
exact motivation for technology innovations with the development of which NIIMBL is tasked.
Given
the large patient populations for various target indications (stroke, Graft
Versus Host Disease, traumatic brain injury, cardiovascular disease) and dose
sizes of 10s to 100s of millions of cells per patient, upscaled manufacturing science technologies will play a critical role
in addressing the growing demand for significant volumes of pharmaceutical
quality hMSCs. Advancements in Regenerative Medicine are fueling the need
for rapid
manufacturing science progress, especially with accelerated approval pathways
for RegenMed drugs being established around the world. RoosterBio, with our
disruptive approach to hMSC manufacturing and use, is uniquely poised to work alongside NIIMBL and other member
organizations to push forward hMSC-based
therapeutic platforms. We are excited to do our part in revolutionizing Biopharmaceutical manufacturing in the coming years.
No comments:
Post a Comment
All comments are welcome, but we do not support hateful or lewd messages. Please make your comments professional and in the spirit of adding to the scientific discussion!