Closed system 10 layer and media bags are
now readilyavailable from several vendors.
|
CHI was kind enough to invite RoosterBio to give the kick-off
presentation, so I was able to get re-immersed on all that is new and improved
in Cell Therapy Manufacturing Scale-up.
This blog post is meant to share a few of the interesting observations
from the meeting and will focus on highlights from the vendor exhibits (i.e.
product innovations) and the posters.
The next blog post will share some take-homes from the talks. There were indeed some valuable and exciting new
reports that I want to communicate.
One key observation is that, while it is still my belief that most of the Allo-products are currently manufactured in 10-layer culture vessels (see above pic), most of the presentations focused on the next generation bioreactor-based processes. There will continue to be a major shift over the next few years to more automated platforms such as these.
Products on Display for BioProduction of Therapeutic Cells
I always find it worth noting what products the vendors have
on display, as they will be developing products based on requests from the
market – so more new products displayed means "growing market", which turns into
better tools available for everyone. Interestingly,
even at a general BioProcessing conference, there were several booths with Cell
Therapy-focused products, and there were 3-5 posters (out of maybe 30) on the
scale-up and processing of human MSCs (hMSCs).
There were a few product innovations and focused product
areas among the vendors that I want to highlight here (and we are not getting paid for this, I promise – no sponsorship at all).
Ready-to-Use Microcarriers from Pall |
·
Pre-sterilized and ready-to-use
microcarriers. Both Pall/Solohill
(see pic) and Corning
now offer these products in bottles, but more importantly, in closed system
bags ready to seed into a bioreactor system.
Microcarriers in the past had to be prepared and autoclaved by the end
user, creating work and yet another set of variables to control when trying to
implement this technology. By providing
pre-sterilized microcarriers that are QC’d for efficient cell attachment (I am
assuming this QC step; I will try to confirm that), this takes one less process
step out of the hands of the process development scientist and makes
implementation that much simpler. This is
an important advancement in the field.
·
PBS Biotech reported hMSC densities (expanded in
their bioreactors) consistently north of 1 million cells/mL, and up to 3 million
cells/mL in a serum containing media.
These numbers are a good 10-fold greater than any number published or
presented just 5 years ago, and the highest and most consistent I have seen
presented to date. It is unclear if the
reason they achieved these targets was due to the microcarrier and media
combination, their
novel low shear bioreactor design, or just plain good bioprocess
engineering - likely a combination of all three. In any case, it is a significant achievement,
and it demonstrates that it can be done.
Other vendors will now be trying to beat it, and cell therapy companies
will be trying to implement it.
·
Vendors are beginning to focus, at least some,
on the post-expansion/downstream
processing (microcarrier removal, cell concentration) of the cells as
well. Millipore
had a presentation and a poster that discussed microcarrier removal using
single use filters and the concentration of hMSCs post-harvest using scalable tangential flow filtration (TFF) technology – both with good post-processing viability and recovery. See poster summary below. Downstream processing continues to be an
under-appreciated aspect of the field and cannot be an afterthought to scale-up
culture. If you scale your expansion to
several hundred liters before beginning to think about how you will process the massive
cell volumes you have, it could set your program back over a year while these
technologies are developed and integrated into the manufacturing process. It is good to see these aspects of manufacturing get some focus here.
Poster Highlights:
There were 3-5 posters (out of maybe 30) on the scale-up of
and processing of hMSCs, and while there was content in the sessions, I didn’t
notice any autologous or immunotherapy-related posters. I am pretty sure all of the Cell
Therapy-related posters focused on the microcarrier- and bioreactor-based
expansion of hMSCs, but the Millipore poster had additional detail around the post-expansion/downstream
processing (microcarrier removal, cell concentration) as discussed above. All of these posters were created by vendors
(not therapeutic companies) and these included:
·
Corning’s
BioProcess group demonstrated efficient hMSC expansion on their new
microcarriers in serum containing media.
They showed that the hMSCs could expand to good cell densities per
microcarrier (30,000 – 70,000 cells/cm2) and maintain viability well
above 90%. hMSCs had normal flow marker
profile and normal karyotype. This work
was performed in small scale glass spinners, and demonstrates (as others are
showing), that hMSCs can maintain their basic phenotype when expansion is
performed in dynamic culture conditions.
There were no functional readouts reported. I was surprised that there wasn’t data in
their serum-free hMSC media, but overall, their microcarrier products look
good.
·
Millipore’s
poster was on microcarrier expansion of hMSCs, but at much larger scales, to
show-off their Mobius
bioreactors. They showed that they could scale-up from 3L
to 50L in single use bioreactor systems and get similar growth curves, and that
they could achieve 10 billion cells in their 50L bioreactors (suggesting
densities of ~200,000 cells/mL). Expanded
cells were analyzed for flow markers (normal), and they also added the
tri-lineage differentiation assays (all normal). Their data shows that scale-down suspension
conditions can scale up, and that the MSCs retain both identity and the ability
to differentiate even at a 50L scale.
Interestingly, they showed methods for using dead end filtration using a
single-use Opticap filter with a 100 um screen to separate the trypsinized
hMSCs from the microcarriers. They were
able to perform the microcarrier separation without loss of viability, and with
a solid recovery of over 90%. This is
definitely technology that others are looking for, so I was happy to see
this. They also demonstrated the use of
a flat sheet TFF for the volume reduction and washing of the hMSCs after
microcarrier separation – again, with good results on viability and recovery.
·
PBS
Biotech had a poster showing hMSC expansion in their vertical wheel
bioreactors. PBS was the only one of the
posters to actually publish the most important metric for bioreactor
expansion of hMSCs, and this is reporting cells/mL over time. They achieved reproducible results of >1
million cells/mL (I think in a serum free system), with the best expansion of
>3 million cells/mL in serum containing medium. These high cell densities are a
significant milestone for the field, as it is the first report (that
I know of) of consistently greater than 1 million cells/mL over multiple runs,
and with the potential to get to >3 million cells/mL.
The vendors with posters all had booths, but there were also a couple other vendors without posters. Personally, it is important for me to see the display of Cell Therapy related products as it underscores the commitment to the space. The other booths/technologies included:
·
Pall: With their recent acquisitions of both Solohill
Engineering (THE microcarrier experts from Ann Arbor) and ATMI (several Cell Therapy relevant bioreactor platforms), Pall is positioning themselves as
major players in cell therapy bioprocessing.
Both acquisitions came with excellent technical teams. I really liked seeing the ready-to-use microcarriers
(see pic above), as well as the Xpansion
bioreactor and the iCELLis
packed bed bioreactor.
·
Eppendorf recently
acquired New Brunswick that just
released a study of hMSC expansion in their BioBlu single use bioreactors. These bioreactors were on display, but they
didn’t seem to be outwardly promoting them for Cell Therapy.
·
Sartorius Stedim
has several bioreactors and downstream processing tools, and they have recently
acquired TAP Biosystems,
that comes with a solid cell-therapy team.
I know the high throughput scaled-down ambr micro bioreactor
system is in use at several cell therapy sites, and Sartorius officially has a
Cell Therapy focus unit now, after several years of being interested in the
space. It will be interesting to see
what they bring together.
In Conclusion
I want to stress that Manufacturing
Matters. Improvements in Manufacturing Tools and Technologies
are what drives scale up and costs down, and when coupled with good, solid
biology and product characterization will drive the sustainability of current
industries and the development of new ones. RoosterBio
is trying to help make this happen for the next generation of cell-based
products and technologies.
We will follow up over the next week with some interesting
take-aways from a few of the talks. Stay tuned.
If there are any questions about the above info I will try
to answer in the comments, or send you to the right person/company that is best
suited to answer you.
I was really excited to hear from Robert Deans at Athersys. They seem to be on the verge of something that will help them change the industry.
ReplyDeleteGreat post!
A very awesome blog post. We are really grateful for your blog post. You will find a lot of approaches after visiting your post. virtual number
ReplyDelete